Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri September 5 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:

> With sincere thanks to Seth Vidal, (he wrote a script do show what
> packages depend on a given package, posted at
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/pkg-provs-tree-view.py)
> here is the list of non-leaf-nodes in "priority" order.
>
> The number on the left is essentially the number of packages that
> depend on the named package.

> 5 fwbuilder-2.1.16-2.fc9

The script should probably check whether dependent packages are built from the 
same src.rpm:

$ python pkg-provs-tree-view.py  --enablerepo=rawhide fwbuilder
fwbuilder - 2.1.14-1.fc8.i386 [cmd line]
 \_  fwbuilder-ipf - 2.1.14-1.fc8.i386 [1: fwbuilder = 2.1.14-1.fc8]
 \_  fwbuilder-pf - 2.1.14-1.fc8.i386 [1: fwbuilder = 2.1.14-1.fc8]
 \_  fwbuilder-ipfw - 2.1.14-1.fc8.i386 [1: fwbuilder = 2.1.14-1.fc8]
 \_  fwbuilder-ipt - 2.1.14-1.fc8.i386 [1: fwbuilder = 2.1.14-1.fc8]

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux