Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/9/5 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Den 5. sep. 2008 22.21 skrev Paul <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > monodevelop-0.19-6.fc9 [u'449441 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) pfj
>>
>> This is a pain. Every time I've tried to build MD 1.0, koji has thrown a
>> wobbler complaining that %{_libdir}/mono/gac can't be found! I will look
>> at it again over this next week though.
>
> Didn't the wonderful Michel fix this recently, he cleaned up the spec and
> bumped us succesfully to 2.0 beta.
>
I haven't touched the F-9 branch; as I'm not running F-9 anymore, and
with the changes in the Mono stack, I didn't want to risk any
breakage. Paul likely knows more about the difference between F-9's
mono and Rawhide's -- Paul, you could perhaps backport the Rawhide
monodevelop to F-9? Some of the BRs might need to be changed.



-- 
Michel Salim
http://hircus.jaiku.com/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux