On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:24:38 -0400 lyos.gemininorezel@xxxxxxxxx (Lyos Gemini Norezel) wrote: > Vasile Gaburici wrote: > > > > I his bugzilla message he is complaining (amongst other things) that > > FESCO did not consider the matter. > > > > I, too, noticed this. I forgot to mention it in my previous message... > but I wanted to ask: > > Was this issue ever raised in a FESCo meeting? Which issue? I know Alain's problems with some of the fedora french community have been discussed. > Was this issue ever put on the discussion agenda? Not that I can recall, although again, it depends on which issue you are talking about here. > One thing many people do not understand... is that any > (comparatively) small governing body, is (by necessity) going to be > swamped by issues. I/We may not like it > (I despise bureaucracy in all it's forms)... but it's a fact of life. Sure, this is one reason I wanted to setup the trac instance to track issues that need FESCo input. > If he did do either of the above... then I can share his outrage. > Otherwise... *shrug*... you can't help those who refuse to help > themselves. I think there are communications problems going on here. It doesn't help that many of the people looking at this do not speak french and thus may be misunderstanding Alain. > Just my thoughts/opinions. > Lyos Gemini Norezel kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
