On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:09:01 -0700, Dave Nomura wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to fix the following broken dependencies in my new package > for Fedora10. > I've tried adding both binutils and binutils-devel to both Requires and > BuildRequires but neither seems to resolve the dependencies. > > Assuming that the libbfd and libopcodes libraries are in binutils or > binutils-devel as in other distros I would have expected this to resolve > the dependency, but apparently not on Fedora. > > Are these located in different packages on Fedora? > > Can anyone tell me what I need to add to my Requires/BuildRequires to > resolve the dependency? > > buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > stapitrace has broken dependencies in the development tree: > > On ppc: > > stapitrace-1.0.0-6.20080622cvs_alpha.fc10.ppc requires > > libbfd-2.18.50.0.8-2.fc10.so > > stapitrace-1.0.0-6.20080622cvs_alpha.fc10.ppc requires > > libopcodes-2.18.50.0.8-2.fc10.so > > Please resolve this as soon as possible. You misinterpret the broken deps report, and you haven't built an update yet that would attempt at fixing the broken deps. libbfd-2.18.50.0.8-2.fc10.so and libopcodes-2.18.50.0.8-2.fc10.so are not available any longer, because binutils-2.18.50.0.9-1.fc10 replaced them with new versions ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=725620 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=725621 ). There you cannot simply add any Requires on binutils, since the new binutils pkg does not include these old libraries. So, normally this means you need to rebuild your package to link against the newer libraries (and their newer sonames which result in automatic dependencies). However, your package fails to build on ppc in a libbfd compile-test. Cat config.log to find out why it fails. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
