Re: Fedora 9.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
nodata wrote:
Am Montag, den 01.09.2008, 16:19 -0400 schrieb Jon Stanley:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are there any plans for a re-release of Fedora 9 with updated keys?
Not as such, no. The current plan can be found at
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2008-August/001627.html,
with the latest draft of the actual locations over at
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2008-August/001635.html
and ensuing discussion

This plan already has FESCo buy-in, with whatever minor tweaks rel-eng
might need to make, but this is the essence of what's going to happen.

"[The new] fedora-release is put into the OLD repo, signed by the OLD
key."

Isn't this counter-intuitive?

The idea is that fedora-release contains the new key and the new
repository location.  So it has to go in the old repository, signed with
the old key so people hitting the old repository get those.

Maybe we should have two new fedora-release packages.  The lower NEVR
one can go in the OLD repo and the newer one in the new repo.  (That way
we end up with 0 packages signed by the old key on the new system).


That is actually already in the plan as written.

Warren

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux