On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Vasile Gaburici <vgaburici@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Matthew Woehlke > <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >>> >>> Uhm... you realize that building an rpm every time you want to test a >>> change as you develop an app is incredibly clunky? It really is not >>> going to happen. Really. >> >> I still submit that this itself is a problem that should be worked on... Why >> must it be "too clunky"? Why can't we fix it so that expecting developers to >> install via rpm, even for incremental builds, is perfectly reasonable? Of >> course this process probably won't involve going through a full rpmbuild, >> just something that tracks the installed files in rpm's database along with >> updating the database for dependencies (i.e. it would replace 'make install' >> but not 'make all'). > > This would be nice, but it is at odds with the idea of building from > pristine (archived) sources. More to the point: -ba --short-circuit is not allowed on purpose. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
