On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> >> Uhm... you realize that building an rpm every time you want to test a >> change as you develop an app is incredibly clunky? It really is not >> going to happen. Really. > > I still submit that this itself is a problem that should be worked on... Why > must it be "too clunky"? Why can't we fix it so that expecting developers to > install via rpm, even for incremental builds, is perfectly reasonable? Of > course this process probably won't involve going through a full rpmbuild, > just something that tracks the installed files in rpm's database along with > updating the database for dependencies (i.e. it would replace 'make install' > but not 'make all'). This would be nice, but it is at odds with the idea of building from pristine (archived) sources. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
