Re: Proposed removal of packages with long-standing FTBFS failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matt Domsch wrote:
> As was proposed to FESCO, packages with unresolved FTBFS bugs
> immediately following the Alpha release will be removed from the
> distribution. Package owners may request that their package _not_ be
> removed provided they are actively working on resolving the FTBFS and
> have a plan to resolve the FTBFS before the Release Candidate
> release.  FESCo has the final say of course, but these are the items
> on my candidate list.  I'd prefer packages get fixed rather than
> removed.  If you are the package owner, or are interested in the
> future of these packages, please investigate these build failures and
> fix them ASAP.

> qa-assistant-0.4.90.5-2.fc6 [u'440914 ASSIGNED'] (build/make) toshio

spot was kind enough to have fixed this when he fixed the license tag in
the spec.  I'll close the FTBS ticket however, I've also orphaned this
package so it will be blocked from F-10 unless someone wants to take it
over.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux