On Friday 29 August 2008 02:01:59 Tom Lane wrote: > John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Is there a concerted effort or SIG around this in Fedora? I've been > > seeing a lot of the associated bugs attached to this tracker > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=333741&hide_resolve > >d=1 as I triage NEW rawhide bugs. > > Well, as one of the people who got hit with several of those "Port <foo> > to use NSS library for cryptography" bugs, These are our tracking bugs. > with no offer of help for a pretty large (and potentially security-critical) > effort We aren't ready for your package yet. > nor even a word of explanation of why I should give a damn about it, The problem is that its been a while and people forget. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01594.html > NSS will get into my packages when someone else does the porting work > and then convinces the various upstreams to adopt it. I'm not planning > to lift a finger on either front. That's fine. We will get to your packages at some point. You can help if you want or wait for us or upstream to do it. -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list