Tom Lane wrote: > "Michel Salim" <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I was just over at gnu.org to download the anniversary video recorded >> by Stephen Fry, and while I was there decided to take a look at what >> systems they recommend as being free. > > I've got all the respect in the world for the work that RMS has done > over the years ... but: > > gnu.org does not acknowledge any license but the GPL as being "truly > free", and they'll never acknowledge any system that is not 100.00% > GPL code as being "truly free". Draw your own conclusions about how > that stance connects to reality. Rubbish. GNU has always accepted that non-GPL licences are free. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses includes dozens of them. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
