Re: rawhide report: 20080829 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



TeXLive 2007 documenation is in the same ballpark as KDE's. For
TL2008, there's even more of it, but split in ~1500 sub-packages...

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "KK" == Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> KK> If it's so easy, then why has it been vetoed for some of our KDE
> KK> packages (like kdepimlibs for kdepimlibs-apidocs, kdeartwork for
> KK> the icon themes and other noarch data, ...)?
>
> What I find odd is that kdelibs does have a noarch subpackage.  Now,
> kdelibs-apidocs is enormous (240MB compressed RPM) so I can understand
> the exception, but if there are rules about how much space needs to be
> saved or how large the noarch subpackage has to be then it would be
> nice to have them written down somewhere.
>
> It's not as if the extra-arches hack is difficult to set up, so I'd
> imagine that the threshold would be pretty low, but it's quite
> possible that there's some overhead or disadvantage I'm not aware of.
>
>  - J<
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux