Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.63, 1.64 git.spec, 1.70, 1.71 sources, 1.63, 1.64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:56:55AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> Though an F-9 update will not.  You just don't yank out commands
>> like that from a stable release.
>
>Yeah, I fully agree.  And that said, is there a compelling reason to
>push git-1.6.0 as an F9 update¹ (aside from "we always have to have the
>very latest release" mantra that many users chant)?  F9 should be fine
>with git-1.5.6.x, shouldn't it?

It fixes a security bug, but I think a later release of 1.5.6.x does as
well.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux