On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:06:28AM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:56:55AM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >>>> Though an F-9 update will not. You just don't yank out commands >>>> like that from a stable release. >>> Yeah, I fully agree. And that said, is there a compelling reason to >>> push git-1.6.0 as an F9 update� (aside from "we always have to have the >>> very latest release" mantra that many users chant)? F9 should be fine >>> with git-1.5.6.x, shouldn't it? >> >> It fixes a security bug, but I think a later release of 1.5.6.x does as >> well. >> > > Also, git 1.6 moves all the git-<commands> away from /usr/bin. Judging by > the reactions on the git mailing list from people who install from sources, > you'd be better off shipping 1.6.0 with F10 and stick with 1.5.6.x for F9. Um. Perhaps you should read the whole email thread you're replying to before you reply. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
