Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: apt-fast
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: apt-fast
From
: Josephine Tannhäuser
apt-fast
From
: A. Mani
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: how to speed up mock?
From
: Stephen Gallagher
how to speed up mock?
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: David Tardon
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Daniel Veillard
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Daniel Veillard
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Daniel Veillard
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: James Antill
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Thomas Moschny
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Thomas Moschny
Re: how to handle a gui- and non-gui-version of the same library/soname
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: David Tardon
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Nikola Pajkovsky
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jan Kratochvil
Re: OT: writing gobject-based plugins
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jan Kratochvil
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Radek Vokal
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jan Kratochvil
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Alexander Larsson
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Alexander Larsson
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
tomorrow's i18n meeting
From
: Jens Petersen
New test machine
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Jens Petersen
Re: libxklavier bump
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Ian Burrell
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Camilo Mesias
gnome-desktop bump
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Mail Lists
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Camilo Mesias
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Mail Lists
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Christoph Wickert
Navit: Re: Any takers for gpsdrive ?
From
: Linuxguy123
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Tom Lane
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Christoph Wickert
how to handle a gui- and non-gui-version of the same library/soname
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Missing multi-lib -debuginfo files.
From
: Gilboa Davara
Re: Missing multi-lib -debuginfo files.
From
: Björn Persson
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Camilo Mesias
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Till Maas
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Missing multi-lib -debuginfo files.
From
: Gilboa Davara
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
libsemanage : does not adhere to Static Library Packaging Guidelines
From
: Carl Gaudreault
libxklavier bump
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Any takers for gpsdrive ?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Ola Thoresen
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Tom Lane
Any takers for gpsdrive ?
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: orphaning some packages
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: orphaning some packages
From
: Peter Lemenkov
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Christoph Höger
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Proposed change to openmpi packaging
From
: Doug Ledford
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Kyle McMartin
Re: enlightenment 17 maintainer awol?
From
: Pavel Shevchuk
Re: OT: writing gobject-based plugins
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
ABRT frustrating for users and developers
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
OT: writing gobject-based plugins
From
: Christoph Höger
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Till Maas
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Desktop categories
From
: charles zeitler
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re:Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: supercyper
Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Looking for Co-Maintainers for PiTiVi and GNonlin
From
: Benjamin Otte
Request for Fedora 13 Feature Page Status Update
From
: John Poelstra
f13 boost-1.41.0 upgrade: pushed
From
: Benjamin Kosnik
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Adam Williamson
Summary/Minutes for (2010-01-15) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: [fedora-java] Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Jeff Johnston
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Re: Desktop categories
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Is abrt broken?
From
: Neil Horman
Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Is abrt broken?
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: glade2 orphaned ??
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Bugzilla quicksearch of closed bugs
From
: John5342
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Bugzilla quicksearch of closed bugs
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Is abrt broken?
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: Proposed change to openmpi packaging
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Is abrt broken?
From
: Josh Stone
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Proposed change to openmpi packaging
From
: Doug Ledford
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: rawhide report: 20100115 changes
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Looking for Co-Maintainers for PiTiVi and GNonlin
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 x86_64
From
: Till Maas
Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Sebastian Dziallas
Re: glade2 orphaned ??
From
: Matthias Clasen
Outage Notification - Fri Jan 15 10:30:00 UTC
From
: Mike McGrath
glade2 orphaned ??
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Hans de Goede
rawhide report: 20100115 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Is abrt broken?
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Is abrt broken?
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Mat Booth
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Mary Ellen Foster
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Dan Horák
Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Till Maas
Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Zing
Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Plan for tomorrow's (2010-01-15) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Matthew Miller
f13 boost-1.41.0 upgrade: notice of intent
From
: Benjamin Kosnik
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 x86_64
From
: Matt Domsch
%cmake macro usage, dropping -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Dan Horák
Re: package kbackup is blocked for tag...
From
: Alain Portal
RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Adam Goode
Re: package kbackup is blocked for tag...
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Soname change for irrlicht
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
package kbackup is blocked for tag...
From
: Alain Portal
Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Jud Craft
Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: rawhide report: 20100114 changes
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
rawhide report: 20100114 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Bastien Nocera
burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Ulrich Drepper
Re: Python 3 heading into rawhide
From
: Luya Tshimbalanga
Python 3 heading into rawhide
From
: David Malcolm
Re: berlios.de compromised since 2005
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: berlios.de compromised since 2005
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Simo Sorce
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: berlios.de compromised since 2005
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: berlios.de compromised since 2005
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: orphaning some packages
From
: Jesus Bustos
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 i386
From
: Pierre-Yves
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: orphaning some packages
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 i386
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 x86_64
From
: Mat Booth
Re: berlios.de compromised since 2005
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: nss version went backwards ?
From
: Elio Maldonado
Re: orphaning some packages
From
: Peter Lemenkov
orphaning some packages
From
: Mike McGrath
Contacting igjurisk ... ?
From
: Andreas Osowski
Does anyone know how to contact igjurisk?
From
: Andreas Osowski
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 x86_64
From
: Gilboa Davara
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Jakub Jelinek
berlios.de compromised since 2005
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 i386
From
: Pierre-Yves
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: John Reiser
Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 i386
From
: Matt Domsch
Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 x86_64
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: nss version went backwards ?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Nick Clifton
Re: nss version went backwards ?
From
: Elio Maldonado
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: rawhide report: 20100113 changes
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Charley Wang
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Daniel Veillard
rawhide report: 20100113 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Manuel Wolfshant
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Laurent Rineau
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Ian Kent
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Lennart Poettering
Outage Notification - 2010-01-13 22:00 UTC
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Bugzilla borked right now (2010-01-12)?
From
: Tom Lane
Heads-Up: Beware of xmlCleanupParser() when your package links against libxml2
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: rpms/seabios/F-12 seabios-0.5.1-669c991.tar.gz, NONE, 1.1 seabios.spec, NONE, 1.1
From
: Justin M. Forbes
Bugzilla borked right now (2010-01-12)?
From
: James Ralston
Re: 'make lint' bug with noarch package
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rpms/seabios/F-12 seabios-0.5.1-669c991.tar.gz, NONE, 1.1 seabios.spec, NONE, 1.1
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Till Maas
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Richard Zidlicky
KDE-SIG weekly report (2/2010)
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
'make lint' bug with noarch package
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: John Reiser
rawhide report: 20100112 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Fabian Deutsch
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Enrico Scholz
RFC: gtk v4l2 (webcam) control panel app + applet
From
: Hans de Goede
enlightenment 17 maintainer awol?
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Miroslav Lichvar
Re: cpp and backslashes
From
: Terry Barnaby
Re: cpp and backslashes
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Richard Zidlicky
cpp and backslashes
From
: Terry Barnaby
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Tom Lane
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Wes Hardaker
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Dead package wiki page
From
: Julian Aloofi
Dead package wiki page
From
: Jerry James
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Bugzilla problem? (missing bugs on home page)
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Mat Booth
Bugzilla problem? (missing bugs on home page)
From
: Tim Jackson
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Peter Jones
Re: rawhide report: 20100109 changes
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Josh Stone
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Charley Wang
soname changing parted heading for rawhide
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler
From
: Charley Wang
Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20100108) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Announcing: Formal Methods SIG
From
: David A. Wheeler
Re: FWD: orphaning curlftpfs , mod_auth_shadow
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: FWD: orphaning curlftpfs , mod_auth_shadow
From
: Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
Re: Desktop caterogies
From
: Rex Dieter
FWD: orphaning curlftpfs , mod_auth_shadow
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Cole Robinson
Re: Package Review Stats for last 10 days ending 10th Jan
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Package Review Stats for last 10 days ending 10th Jan
From
: Rakesh Pandit
rawhide report: 20100111 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20100108) FESCo meeting
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Till Maas
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Jens Petersen
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Alexander Kahl
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Alexander Kahl
Re: Desktop caterogies
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Desktop caterogies
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kalev Lember
python-IPy "major" upgrade
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Build fail I cannot explain
From
: Tim Niemueller
Re: Build fail I cannot explain
From
: John5342
Re: Build fail I cannot explain
From
: Nicolas Chauvet
Build fail I cannot explain
From
: Tim Niemueller
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Christopher Brown
Sources file audit - 2010-01-06
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: how to install source packages?
From
: Paul Frields
rawhide report: 20100110 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: how to install source packages?
From
: Mathieu Bridon
Re: how to install source packages?
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: how to install source packages?
From
: Felix Kaechele
second test to old address
From
: Jon Stanley
test to the new address
From
: Jon Stanley
how to install source packages?
From
: Jud Craft
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Richard Zidlicky
rawhide report: 20100109 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: Bugzilla Outage/Upgrade - 2010-01-09
From
: Parag N(पराग़)
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: David A. Wheeler
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: rawhide report: possible improvements ?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: rawhide report: possible improvements ?
From
: David Timms
Re: Heads-up: %define vs %global in specs
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: dr johnson
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Jerry James
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Review request begs
From
: stefan riemens
Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Come back
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Review request begs
From
: Peter Robinson
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Jan Kratochvil
Meeting Summary/logs for (20100108) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Review request begs
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: Come back
From
: Thomas Moschny
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: RFE : split transmission into subpackages: Request for review
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: Come back
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Come back
From
: Alain Portal
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Zing
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Jerry James
Re: Come back
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: Come back
From
: Andrea Musuruane
Come back
From
: Alain Portal
Re: yum-presto occasionally goes into "eternal" loop looking for deltas
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Andreas Schwab
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Till Maas
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Till Maas
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Till Maas
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Till Maas
rawhide report: 20100108 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
RFE : split transmission into subpackages: Request for review
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Alexander Kahl
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: Alexander Kahl
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: [PATCH] Bodhi No Frozen Rawhide & Critical Path support
From
: Luke Macken
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: David Tardon
Re: Recommendations on how to handle this package and its libraries
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Plan for tomorrow's (20100108) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Peter Hutterer
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Wes Hardaker
Re: yum-presto occasionally goes into "eternal" loop looking for deltas
From
: James Antill
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Zing
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Matthias Clasen
Moin orphaned in EL-4 and EL-5
From
: Ville-Pekka Vainio
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: [PATCH] Bodhi No Frozen Rawhide & Critical Path support
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: [PATCH] Bodhi No Frozen Rawhide & Critical Path support
From
: James Laska
Re: yum-presto occasionally goes into "eternal" loop looking for deltas
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Enrico Scholz
yum-presto occasionally goes into "eternal" loop looking for deltas
From
: Pekka Pietikainen
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Colin Walters
Re: UPDATE Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Dan Horák
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Pulseaudio update issue... [ UPDATE 2 ]
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: David Cantrell
[PATCH] Bodhi No Frozen Rawhide & Critical Path support
From
: Luke Macken
Pulseaudio update issue...
From
: Nathanael D. Noblet
Question about dist-cvs make targets
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Zing
Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Fulko Hew
Re: rawhide report: 20100107 changes
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
rawhide report: 20100107 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Till Maas
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Till Maas
Re: End of days?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: yum-presto and comps
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: Heads-up: %define vs %global in specs
From
: Panu Matilainen
yum-presto and comps
From
: Jens Petersen
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: End of days?
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: David Tardon
Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Sam Varshavchik
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: drago01
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Zing
Re: End of days?
From
: Robert Relyea
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Owen Taylor
End of days?
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: nodata
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Hans Ulrich Niedermann
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Till Maas
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Till Maas
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: nodata
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Stu Tomlinson
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Dave Jones
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Peter Jones
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Till Maas
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Zing
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Peter Jones
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Kalev Lember
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Till Maas
PLEASE READ THIS FIRST: Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Dave Jones
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Serge E. Hallyn
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: drago01
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Radek Vokál
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Serge E. Hallyn
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Jerry James
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Simo Sorce
Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Serge E. Hallyn
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Fulko Hew
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Alexander Boström
Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora
From
: David A. Wheeler
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: packaging guide
From
: Adam Miller
packaging guide
From
: psmith
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Serge E. Hallyn
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Tim Waugh
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Matthew Booth
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Philip Heron
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: RFE: Never, ever steal focus.
From
: Haïkel Guémar
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
