On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 01:45 +0100, Alain Portal wrote: > Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010 23:42:41, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote: > > > A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In > french : > > > « mort- > > > né ») as it seems to be optionnal. > > > > > > What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is > really > > > too full! > > > There are 29 applications entries in it, this is unreadable. > > > > > > On FC6, my Utility menu have 7 submenus: > > > - Accessibility > > > - Office > > > - Text editors > > > - Files > > > - Devices > > > - PIM > > > - Others > > > > > > It was really more convenient... > > > > There's no need to break the upstream spec for this. It already > allows > > you to specify the type of app at a pretty fine level (there's > > categories for text editors and so on). Exactly how to construct the > > final system menus *from* the categories defined in the .desktop > file is > > left up to the DE / distro to decide, so Fedora could choose to have > > more levels in its menus if we wanted to. > > <mode l10n="French"> > Putain ! Mais c'est pas possible ! > C'est à se cogner la tête contre les murs !!! > Un vrai dialogue de sourds... > </mode> > > Please, is there a french speaking fedora developer to contact me and > who > could help me to tell what I want to tell. > It is now clear to me that I'm not understood... Um. We understand you perfectly well. We're just explaining that you do not need to add extra non-standard fields to .desktop files to make it possible to have these extra menu levels. It's entirely possible without having non-standard .desktop fields at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
