On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 23:04 +0100, Alain Portal wrote: > A good initiative, but seems to be stillborn (stillbirth? In french : > « mort- > né ») as it seems to be optionnal. > > What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is really > too full! > There are 29 applications entries in it, this is unreadable. > > On FC6, my Utility menu have 7 submenus: > - Accessibility > - Office > - Text editors > - Files > - Devices > - PIM > - Others > > It was really more convenient... There's no need to break the upstream spec for this. It already allows you to specify the type of app at a pretty fine level (there's categories for text editors and so on). Exactly how to construct the final system menus *from* the categories defined in the .desktop file is left up to the DE / distro to decide, so Fedora could choose to have more levels in its menus if we wanted to. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
