Kevin, you claim the check is done against latest devel tree but I see
few fairly archaic package versions .. like
rvokal:BADURL:wireshark-1.1.1.tar.gz:wireshark
Dne 6.1.2010 19:38, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
This sourcecheck script takes a full checkout of all Fedora packages
in the devel branch and runs 'spectool -g' on each spec file to download
any sources that contain a valid URI. It then checks any downloaded
source files against the 'sources' file and the checksum of the source
in our lookaside cache.
- There are 1612 lines in this run. Up from 932 last run.
700 sourcecheck-20070826.txt
620 sourcecheck-20070917.txt
561 sourcecheck-20071017.txt
775 sourcecheck-20080206.txt
685 sourcecheck-20080214.txt
674 sourcecheck-20080301.txt
666 sourcecheck-20080401.txt
660 sourcecheck-20080501.txt
642 sourcecheck-20080603.txt
649 sourcecheck-20080705.txt
662 sourcecheck-20080801.txt
912 sourcecheck-20081114.txt
884 sourcecheck-20090215.txt
1060 sourcecheck-20090810.txt
932 sourcecheck-20091101.txt
1612 sourcecheck-20100105.txt
You can find the results file at:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck/sourcecheck-20100105.txt
And also attached to this mail.
Additionally, I have the output from each packages 'spectool -g' run in:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck/sourcecheck-20100105/<pkgname>-dl.txt
So you can look at what my script got for trying to download your packages source.
This should allow folks to see transitory network failures and the like.
Lines in the output are of three forms:
- BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in
a download of the source. This could be any of: URL changed, version
changed and URL wasn't updated, Site is down, Site is gone, etc.
Also there are a number of packages with incorrect sourceforge links.
(BTW, there are still some packages with ftp://people.redhat.com/
URLs). This could also be a transitory network failure from my checking
host or the project hosting.
- BADSOURCE:$SOURCENAME:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the source was downloaded ok from the upstream site,
but doesn't match the md5sum given in the sources file.
This could be due to needing to strip out content that fedora cannot
ship (but in that case you shouldn't have the full URI in the Source
line). Or upstream following poor release practices and updating
without changing their release. Or tampering with the source
package.
- BAD_CVS_SOURCE:$SOURCENAME:$PACKAGENAME
This means that the file was downloaded from the URI given, and the
md5sum did not match the file thats present in CVS (not the lookaside).
This might be due to timestamps, or any of the above reasons.
You should fix your package(s) for any of the above problems.
NOTE: You should check in a fixed spec file to the devel branch, but
there is no need to rebuild your package simply this change unless
there was a functional change due to different sources.
kevin
--
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
