Re: Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:06:09PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:01:20PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:28PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00:50AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > > The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open
> > > > since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build.  These
> > > > are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything
> > > > else (over 8800) managed to build for Fedora 12 or newer already.
> > > 
> > > At today's FESCo meeting, it was agreed that all the below packages
> > > would be marked orphan.  I know several of these have been fixed by
> > > provenpackagers already - you are welcome to un-orphan and maintain
> > > them going forward, or the original package owner may choose to do so.
> > 

> I made sure that no one who fixed a package was actually the package
> owner.
> 
> Pre-orphaning:
> 
[...]

The list of packages you announced that are going to be orphaned and the
list of packages that were orphaned are not the same. recordmydesktop
was on the to-be-orphaned list but afaics was not orphaned and also was
not mentioned in your list about which provenpackager fixed which
package.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpGb6I2hPeH9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux