On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:34 -0500, James Laska wrote: > Just to properly set expectations, I'd like to point out that while I > agree that critical path package updates should meet a higher degree of > quality, we've not yet collectively determined what "testing updates" > means. QA is working on the infrastructure to support test automation > and bouncing around ideas as to what a quality package update might look > like. Until then, the same procedures in place for updates-testing now > will be used for critical path packages [1]. During the freezes for F-12, releng at least took time to install, and minimally run the packages that were critical before allowing them to break freeze. That's what is expected out of this as well, a minimal look to ensure no brown paper bag updates get through. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
