Re: Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:13:41 -0600, Matt wrote:

> Folks, while I appreciate you fixing these packages so they build
> again, _please_ do take the time to consider if they are unloved
> enough to be orphaned and dropped anyhow.  If it's a leaf node in the
> dependency tree, dead upstream, and unresponsive Fedora maintainer, it
> should be orphaned and dropped rather than having a little bit of tape
> applied to it and sent back into the game...

For heaven's sake, yes, yes, *YES*!

We want responsive maintainers (at least _one per package_) for every
package in the Fedora package collection.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux