Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
> is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
> system with Rawhide, if one installs the repo file, e.g. only to be
> able to easily download the src.rpm files with yumdownloader or to
> query it with repoquery, but not to actually install the unsigned
> packages from it. 

How many folks do this? I suppose this is a downside... we could also
ship it with default disabled, so you would need to install and then
enable it. 

> It will probably also auto break systems that just
> install everything, which is also not nice.

I don't think it's possible to 'install everything'. 
There are a number of packages in the collection that conflict.
Or do you have some other meaning for 'everything'?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux