Hi, On 01/16/2010 12:14 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 22:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote: >> But what about the other packages by these maintainers that do not fail >> to build but are probably as unmaintained as the packages that fail to >> build? >> > > Because this isn't a fully proper non-responsive maintainer approach, we > felt it was only necessary to orphan the particular packages in > question. These maintainers may have been active elsewhere, and > wholesale orphaning with very little notice does not seem appropriate. > I don't see who the orphaning without following proper procedure is appropriate at all. Simply blocking the ones which FTBFS bugs were not fixed from F-13 inclusion would have been the appropriate response (as documented in our procedures), not some adhoc almost random response. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
