On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 10:59 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > You know we have a procedure for this it is called the awol maintainer > procedure and it would be nice if FESco would follow its on procedures > here. > > Ah well I guess the rules don't apply to those who make them :( > > The non-responsive maintainer process is a rather lengthy and involved process, one which wouldn't lead to these packages being blocked in time. Due to that we decided it would be best to special case these and orphan them right away, so that this current set of packages can be dealt with appropriately. If a volunteer wishes to instigate a non-responsive process on all the maintainers, that is a separate matter which can happen concurrently to the current actions. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
