-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2010 04:32 PM, Jerry James wrote: > It sounds like we should tell the Fedora Project Board that we are > forming, and appoint someone to send them regular status reports. We > should also tell the Packaging Committee that we have identified some > problems with the current Lisp packaging guidelines and plan to submit > revisions to those guidelines. So according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Defining_projects it's our turn to state missions goals now for a CL SIG, right? I've collected all links mentioned so far at my talk page in the wiki [1] and suggest we start off with finding common denominators and stick to the project definition guide - we shouldn't declare anything premature to the board. I'll try to contribute as much as possible depending on my spare time. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_talk:Akahl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktK5ugACgkQVTRddCFHw11GTACeMA4fHBR4uCFKLO0mcPsSe/E5 nBwAn1F1BdHdKWgZxXf0JTY6EAkr6pjg =mpq5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
