Re: Common Lisp apps in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Alexander Kahl
<akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for the offer; currently I'm busy with getting GNUnet through the
> review, ccl can be next on the list but I'm unsure whether it wouldn't
> be better if we'd focus on packaging most commonly used CL libs like
> Alexandria first. ATM Debian (and its brown derivative) seems to be the
> no. 1 distro of choice for CL devs and I'd like to change that.

I have a handful of candidate CL library packages, including alexandria, here:

http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/

The problem is that I followed the packaging guidelines, and thus used
common-lisp-controller which, as I mentioned, doesn't work for any CL
engine currently available in Fedora.  I think we have to fix that
first.

> Are you (or is anyone else here) interested in founding a Common Lisp SIG?

Yes, I think we need to do so.  Count me in.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux