On 09/01/10 00:32, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Jan 8 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
----------------------------------------------------------
...
> ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-HTTP-doc-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-HTTP-doc-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-HTTP-prof-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cairo-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cairo-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cairo-prof-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cgi-devel-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cgi-devel-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cgi-doc-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cgi-doc-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-cgi-prof-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-fgl-devel-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-fgl-devel-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-fgl-doc-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-fgl-doc-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-fgl-prof-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-gconf-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
> ghc-gconf-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
Hi, I noticed that some broken ones are duped (usually together), making
it look like there is nearly twice as many as there really is.
Would sort -u dedupe those ?
Also, it could be cleaner and easier to read to invert or summarize the
unsatisfied requires like:
Broken dependencies:
ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686
ghc-cairo-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686
ghc-fgl-devel-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686
ghc-gconf-devel-0.10.1-5.fc12.i686
ghc-cgi-devel-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686
all require ghc = 0:6.10.4, which is not available.
or
ghc-doc = 0:6.10.4 is not available, but is required by:
ghc-HTTP-doc-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686
ghc-cgi-doc-3001.1.7.1-3.fc13.i686
ghc-fgl-doc-5.4.2.2-1.fc12.i686
It might be nice to see the headings indented, and the package n-v-r-a
info not indented, (since long package names, makes for more difficult
to read emails, due to replies inserting quoting (> ) characters and
oveflowing a single line.
Also the report subject could include say '-' separators between y, m,
day, like 2010-01-08 (which is another variant of the iso format that
still sorts by date nicely ;)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
