Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:59:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
>>>> Anyone else interested in working on packaging this?
>>> Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs?
>> No. That's "Needs Work".
>
> Wait, scratch that -- the work is done. And it's easy:
>
> option (WITH_RAWZOR "Build with Rawzor support" OFF)
>
> It also needs to be removed from the source tarball, as do some libs
> precompiled for win32.
>
> There's also some minor per-file license-statement issues (with themes and
> tranlations) but that should be easily and hopefully quickly addressed.
> http://code.google.com/p/rawtherapee/issues/detail?id=16

I had attempted to package it, since it would be probably of interest 
for the Design Suite, but building currently fails due to [1]. I'm not 
sure whether I'll be able to look into it over the next days, but if 
somebody else needs a reviewer or co-maintainer, I'm certainly up for it.

--Sebastian

[1] 
http://www.rawtherapee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1701&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux