On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Zing <zing@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What makes you think these same users won't then also edit and enable > rawhide at this point? It's not much of a stretch to think these > seemingly innocent users might see this "rawhide" package, install, > and then also enable it; in fact, ISTM, a package that they don't > have that promises some type of newest whizbang gadgets that they're > missing out on might entice more of this class of user. :( Because it won't be on the live media that many of the install from, or the default groups that would be choosen from the dvd install. Which is more likely: 1. I am going to enable all the repos I can, oh look, something called rawhide is already here. I'll just enable it. 2. I am going to enable all the repos I can, ok. Now I am going to randomly look through the almost 19,000 packages for some that might have repo files to enable. > Might I suggest: > > $ chattr +i /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo > > just kidding, well, half-kidding :) I don't want to lock rawhide in a cabinet in the basement with a 'beware of leopard' sign on it. I just don't want it to be in the same packet of stuff that everyone who comes into the store gets by default. ;) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
