On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:58:54 +0100 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But what about the other packages by these maintainers that do not > fail to build but are probably as unmaintained as the packages that > fail to build? There may be some cases of that. If so, the non responsive maintainer procedure should be used on those maintainers. > > perl-SVN-Mirror iburrell (fixed by Till Maas; spot says kill it) > > perl-SVN-Simple iburrell > > There is a minor error: I fixed the -Simple package with a patch > submitted in the upstream bugtracker iirc 7 days ago. But I also > noticed that the -Mirror package was removed from debian. > > But what about the other packages from this maintainer? He maintains > around 36 other packages: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/iburrell > > E.g. the jigdo packages also has 4 bug. I looked at two an both did > not receive any comments from the maintainer: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426847 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503833 Indeed. I don't see much activity from them. Have you tried sending them an email? If not, I can. > Therefore the non responsive maintainer procedure, i.e. orphaning all > packages from the affected maintainers, seems to me to be more > appropriate. In this particular case, yes. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
