Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I know that APRT is still very young technology, but after 2 months it's > time for a interim conclusion [ to wit, it sucks ] Yes. The primary problem I'm seeing is that even when it gives you a useful backtrace, the bug report consists *only* of the backtrace, which is very seldom enough information. Users have to provide information about what they were doing, copies of input files, etc etc just the same as in a manually-initiated bug report. If ABRT is making that difficult or even just failing to encourage inclusion of the information, it's useless if not worse than useless. Note: I haven't seen the submitter's end of ABRT yet, just the bug reports. Maybe it does ask for more info ... but none of the abrt bugzillas I've gotten have included any. I ask for followup, and generally the thing just stays in NEEDINFO state. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
