Linux Next

• Thread Index

• linux-next: failed to fetch proc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Staging: pohmelfs: should include fs_struct.h
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30: [BUG] kmemleak page fault
  • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] build fix for generic debug pagealloc
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] x86: fix build error when CONFIG_K8_NB=n
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] build fix for generic debug pagealloc
  • From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30: [BUG] kmemleak page fault
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: fix build error when CONFIG_K8_NB=n
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: pohmelfs: should include fs_struct.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-0402: build fails at mm/debug-pagealloc.c
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Patch next] powerpc: pseries/dtl.c should include asm/firmware.h
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: vfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: vfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Invalid module format (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Patch next] powerpc: pseries/dtl.c should include asm/firmware.h
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] parisc: asm/pdc.h should include asm/page.h
  • From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Invalid module format (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1)
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Invalid module format (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1)
  • From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] parisc: asm/pdc.h should include asm/page.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Invalid module format (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1)
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] parisc: asm/pdc.h should include asm/page.h
  • From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] parisc: asm/pdc.h should include asm/page.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] parisc: asm/pdc.h should include asm/page.h
  • From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing/powerpc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop should depend on RFKILL
  • From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing/powerpc tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [Patch next] powerpc: pseries/dtl.c should include asm/firmware.h
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30: [BUG] kmemleak page fault
  • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next] parisc: asm/pdc.h should include asm/page.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30: [BUG] kmemleak page fault
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] cx231xx: fix wrong usage of select in kconfig
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sony-laptop should depend on RFKILL
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sony-laptop should depend on RFKILL
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: comedi: Remove useless code
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: rt3070: replace __FUNCTION__ usages
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: comedi: replace __FUNCTION__ usages
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: sxg: replace __FUNCTION__ usages
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: add checks of block references for non-extent inodes
  • From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: add checks of block references for non-extent inodes
  • From: Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHSET 0/8 version 4] exofs for kernel 2.6.30
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHSET 0/8 version 4] exofs for kernel 2.6.30
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHSET 0/8 version 4] exofs for kernel 2.6.30
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHSET 0/8 version 4] exofs for kernel 2.6.30
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: reminder about contents
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing/powerpc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHSET 0/8 version 4] exofs for kernel 2.6.30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] blackfin: allow allow usage of string functions in linux/string.h
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30 (Blackfin string failures again)
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30 (Blackfin string failures again)
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
• [patch bugfix] UV system table in bios accessed after unmap
  • From: Russ Anderson <rja@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHSET 0/8 version 4] exofs for kernel 2.6.30
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] exofs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 30: [BUG] kmemleak page fault
  • From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 2/2] PARISC: iosapic: fix build breakage
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 27 : s390 defconfig build failure
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] exofs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ext4 tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with the security-testing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (longhaul build error)
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (longhaul build error)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with the security-testing tree
  • From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 27 : s390 defconfig build failure
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing/powerpc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 27 : s390 defconfig build failure
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing/powerpc tree build failure
  • From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 27
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tracing/powerpc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] benet: use do_div() for 64 bit divide
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 25: Boot failure on powerpc [recursive locking detected]
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 25: Boot failure on powerpc [recursive locking detected]
  • From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 25: Boot failure on powerpc [recursive locking detected]
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with the security-testing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [HWRNG] fixed timeriomem-rng to use a phys address rather than virt
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 26: s390 allnoconfig build failure still exists
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] exofs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] benet: use do_div() for 64 bit divide
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] benet: use do_div() for 64 bit divide
  • From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Invalid module format: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 26 (benet)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 25: Boot failure on powerpc [recursive locking detected]
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 26: s390 allnoconfig build failure still exists
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 26: s390 allnoconfig build failure still exists
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] m68k: irq_node.handler() should return irqreturn_t
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: fix warning about invalid const usage
  • From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: fix nf_logger name in ebt_ulog.
  • From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: fix warning in ebt_ulog init function.
  • From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Eric Leblond <eric@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: fix nf_logger name in ebt_ulog.
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/3] netfilter: fix warning in ebt_ulog init function.
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: fix warning about invalid const usage
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the dwmw2-iommu tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 25: Boot failure on powerpc [recursive locking detected]
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jiri Gaisler <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [XTENSA] - Updated 2.6.27-smp with changes needed for SMP stabilization and New Xtensa V3 MMU
  • From: Piet Delaney <piet.delaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch 1/4] genirq: make irqreturn_t an enum
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (drivers/media/video/cx231xx)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 25: staging/epl build break.
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Re: Next March 25: net/netfilter/xt_LED build failure.
  • From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Re: Next March 25: net/netfilter/xt_LED build failure.
  • From: Subrata Modak <tosubrata@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Re: Next March 25: net/netfilter/xt_LED build failure.
  • From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Re: Next March 25: staging/epl build break.
  • From: Subrata Modak <tosubrata@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Re: Next March 25: net/netfilter/xt_LED build failure.
  • From: Subrata Modak <tosubrata@xxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 25 : arch/x86/kernel : k8_northbridges
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 25: staging/epl build break.
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 25: net/netfilter/xt_LED build failure.
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: some stats
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: replace MAC80211_LEDS with P54_LEDS in p54.h
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] p54: replace MAC80211_LEDS with P54_LEDS in p54.h
  • From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpus4096 tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Invalid module format: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: comedi: Remove useless code
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: comedi: replace __FUNCTION__ usages
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: rt3070: replace __FUNCTION__ usages
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: sxg: replace __FUNCTION__ usages
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Invalid module format: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 24: Inconsistent lock state trace
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 23 (media/video/hdpvr)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 23 (media/video/hdpvr)
  • From: Janne Grunau <j@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 23 (media/video/hdpvr)
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 23 (media/video/hdpvr)
  • From: Janne Grunau <j@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 23 (media/video/hdpvr)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: pci tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the genirq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dnet: DNET should depend on HAS_IOMEM
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] [HWRNG] fixed timeriomem-rng to use a phys address rather than virt
  • From: Alexander Clouter <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - crypto crash on s390
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - crypto crash on s390
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - timeriomem build break on s390
  • From: Alexander Clouter <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - crypto crash on s390
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - timeriomem build break on s390
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 18 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Staging: psb: fix build problem
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 18 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Staging: comedi: Fix an other build problem
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Staging: comedi: Fix build problem
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] p54: fix SoftLED compile dependencies
  • From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sh build failure
  • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sh build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: comedi: Fix an other build problem
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: comedi: Fix build problem
  • From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [Patch] Re: Next March 20 : drivers/md/dm-exception-store build break
  • From: Subrata Modak <tosubrata@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - crypto crash on s390
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Staging: psb: fix build problem
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] dnet: DNET should depend on HAS_IOMEM
  • From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: s390 build failure
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: s390 build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next 2/2] PARISC: iosapic: fix build breakage
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next 1/2] PARISC: led: remove proc_dir_entry::owner
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090318-20: drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-dvb.ko undefined!
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - dnet build break on s390
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 20 - timeriomem build break on s390
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 20 : drivers/md/dm-exception-store build break
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: s390 build failure
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree
  • From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the drm tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree
  • From: Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (media/au8522)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sh build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: s390 build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: s390 build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: arm build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (media/video/au0828)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpus4096 tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (wireless/p54)
  • From: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (staging/psb)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 19: drivers/comedi build break.
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (wireless/p54)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (wireless/p54)
  • From: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (wireless/p54)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (media/video/cx231xx/)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (media/au8522)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (staging/psb)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (media/video/au0828)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 18 (mm.h #error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 19: drivers/comedi build break.
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 19: drivers/comedi build break.
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• m68k ICE on drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/fw.c
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next-20090319] wireless/p54: P54_SPI should depend on GENERIC_HARDIRQS
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpus4096 tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpus4096 tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpus4096 tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cpus4096 tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kmemcheck/x86 trees
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kmemcheck/x86 trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kmemcheck/x86 trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc/pmi: irq handlers return irqreturn_t
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpus4096 tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [git pull] m68k fix user exported includes
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090318: sunhme does not transmit packets
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging/line6: fix build error, select SND_RAWMIDI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 18 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 18 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 18 (mm.h #error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20090316] sunrpc: fix build breakage
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (slob)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 18: [staging/net ??] build break
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 18: [staging/net ??] build break
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next March 18: defconfig build break on s390
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Next March 18: defconfig build break on s390
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090317: ia64/kvm build fails
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090317: ia64/kvm build fails
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Microblaze arch merging
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (slob)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] slob: fix build problem
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Microblaze arch merging
  • From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] slob: fix build problem
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next] slob: fix build problem
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (slob)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the async_tx tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New linux-next tree suspend-2.6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: suspend tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-removal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: nfsd tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: nfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr quilt series import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the async_tx tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the async_tx tree with the arm tree
  • From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New linux-next tree suspend-2.6
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: New linux-next tree suspend-2.6
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: suspend tree build failure
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (slob)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] powerpc/5200: fix building GPT driver without sysfs
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next] powerpc/5200: fix building GPT driver without sysfs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-removal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: nfsd tree build warning
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20090316] sunrpc: fix build breakage
  • From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next-20090316] sunrpc: fix build breakage
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090316: Inotify: inconsistent lock state
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: nfs tree build failure
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: nfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: suspend tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New linux-next tree suspend-2.6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc/cell: fix unused variable warning in interrupt.c
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Dhananjay Phadke <dhananjay@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-removal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: nfsd tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the async_tx tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: New linux-next tree suspend-2.6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• New linux-next tree suspend-2.6
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 12 (tty)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build failure
  • From: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure
  • From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net-current/net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 12 (tty)
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 12 (tty)
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 12 (tty)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net-current/net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dnet: replace obsolete *netif_rx_* functions with *napi_*
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build warnings
  • From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] dnet: replace obsolete *netif_rx_* functions with *napi_*
  • From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Kernel panic on linux-nextMarch 12
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test scripts
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test scripts
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test scripts
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-ipw3945-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: No Tree for March 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: lblnet tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: m68k: kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: md tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net-current/net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: md tree build failure
  • From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: nfs tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: import of ide quilt series failed
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: import of ide quilt series failed
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: import of ide quilt series failed
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: import of ide quilt series failed
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: nfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make headers_install broken for ARCH=m68k in 2.6.29-rc7.
  • From: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: nfs tree build failure
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-ipw3945-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: block/proc tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• m68k: kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next 12 : arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram build failure
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 2.6.29-rc7: ext4 hangs on sparc (was: next-20090310: ext4 hangs)
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next 12 : arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram build failure
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Collection of working and tested kernel configurations
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-configs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Next 12 : arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram build failure
  • From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warning
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: nfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: block/proc tree build failure
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure
  • From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (staging/multimedia)
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (staging/multimedia)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (staging/multimedia)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (staging/multimedia)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (staging/multimedia)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: block/proc tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: block/proc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RESEND GIT PATCH tj-percpu] percpu: fix spurious alignment WARN in legacy SMP percpu allocator
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend status on -wl and -next
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] scsi/m68k: Kill NCR_700_detect() warnings
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (m68k/tlbflush.h)
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RESEND GIT PATCH tj-percpu] percpu: fix spurious alignment WARN in legacy SMP percpu allocator
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [RESEND GIT PATCH tj-percpu] percpu: fix spurious alignment WARN in legacy SMP percpu allocator
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [GIT PATCH tj-percpu] percpu: fix spurious alignment WARN in legacy SMP percpu allocator
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: md tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next 10: Badness at mm/allocpercpu.c:123
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: NCR_700_detect warnings
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: NCR_700_detect warnings
  • From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: NCR_700_detect warnings
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (m68k/tlbflush.h)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging/p9auth: fix dependency/build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10 (crypto & NLATTR)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Next 10: Badness at mm/allocpercpu.c:123
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
• next-20090310: ext4 hangs
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 3/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for SCTP protocol
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 10
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the md tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: md tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the md tree with the tree
  • From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: md tree build failure
  • From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: md tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the md tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: input tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: input tree build failure
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: input tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: xfs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tracing tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 0/4] netfilter conntrack sysctls pernet support
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 0/4] netfilter conntrack sysctls pernet support
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC 0/4] netfilter conntrack sysctls pernet support
  • From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC 2/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for DCCP protocol
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC 3/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for SCTP protocol
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC 4/4] net: netfilter conntrack - add per-net functionality for UDPLITE protocol
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC 0/4] netfilter conntrack sysctls pernet support
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [RFC 1/4] net: sysctl_net - use net_eq to compare nets
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no release for March 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the blackfin and x86 trees
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ieee1394 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] dvb/frontends: fix duplicate 'debug' symbol
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] dvb/frontends: fix duplicate 'debug' symbol
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] dvb/frontends: fix duplicate 'debug' symbol
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
  • From: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 6 (ath9k)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: x86 tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the tracing tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: state of the trees
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS: inconsistent lock state
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: state of the trees
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the tracing tree
  • From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ieee1394 tree with the tree
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the tracing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: x86 tree build warning
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: state of the trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the blackfin and x86 trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: x86 tree build warning
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ieee1394 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kernel-doc tree with the tracing and timers trees
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tracing tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kernel-doc tree with the tracing and timers trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>