Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - powerpc - drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 14
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: quota tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 13 (gfs2 build error)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] next-20090113 - scsi_debug fails with CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=n
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] next-20090113 - scsi_debug fails with CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=n
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] scsi_debug: needs CRC_T10DIF
- From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH -next] libfc: needs CRC32
- From: "Love, Robert W" <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (afs/fscache)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] scsi_debug: needs CRC_T10DIF
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] libfc: needs CRC32
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: drm tree build failure
- From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
- From: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: drm tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: mfd tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
- From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
- From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cacheinfo: rename cache_dir per-cpu variable
- From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
- From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: import of rr tree failed
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (multimedia/cx88)
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] i2400m/usb: wrap USB power saving in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (multimedia/cx88)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
- From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build fixes (v2)
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree build warning
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
- From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build / PM fixes (v3)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Michael Marineau <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspend issues on all latest kernels!
- From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Suspend issues on all latest kernels!
- From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-20090106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] i2400m/usb: wrap USB power saving in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build / PM fixes (v3)
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (ath9k)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Michael Marineau <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2)
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/altpciehdma)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/comedi)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
- From: Iñaky Pérez-González <inaky.perez-gonzalez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
- From: Alexey Korolev <akorolev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #2)
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia build errors)
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: firmware tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #2)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia build errors)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (dm-target)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for Squashfs
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for Squashfs
- From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for Squashfs
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Pull request for Squashfs
- From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 4/4] starfire: use request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 2/4] firmware: convert acenic driver to request_firmware() -- without firmware data
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
- From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] 9p: fix RDMA dependency
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] sunrpc: fix RDMA dependency
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] 9p: fix RDMA dependency
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 2
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for January 2
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081231 - S390x kernel panics while bootup at init_sched_build_groups()
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for January 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: "Kyle Moffett" <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] next-20081231 -powerpc - panic at tasklet_kill_immediate()
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] next-20081231 - S390x kernel panics while bootup at init_sched_build_groups()
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 31
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 30
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
- From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i - remove use of skb->sp
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] fcoe driver build fails with !CONFIG_PCI
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/14] Kernel memory leak detector
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -net-next 2/4] firmware: convert acenic driver to request_firmware() -- without firmware data
- From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -net-next 4/4] starfire: use request_firmware()
- From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
- From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -net-next 0/4] firmware patches for net drivers
- From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
- From: Karen Xie <kxie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i - remove use of skb->sp
- From: Karen Xie <kxie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/14] Kernel memory leak detector
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] cxgb3i: use same dependencies as CHELSIO_T3
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Aleksey Senin <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 29
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
- From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the uwb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the uwb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Aleksey Senin <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: "Aleksey Senin" <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the creds tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: timers tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the timers tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: origin tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: origin tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr tree import failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: 2.6.30 inclusions
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
- From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparc64: fix unsigned long long warnings in drivers
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: no linux-next release for Dec 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: no linux-next for Dec 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: sched tree build warning
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: usb tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] advansys: use request_firmware
- From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparseirq: fix numa_migrate_irq_desc dependency and comments
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparseirq: fix numa_migrate_irq_desc dependency and comments
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Firmware patches for Network
- From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Firmware patches for DVB
- From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Firmware patches for SCSI
- From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
- From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: perfmon3 tree removed
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (slow-work)
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (slow-work)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (DVB)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081217-s390x-'struct device' has no member named 'knode_parent'
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: Remove old kvm_guest_debug structs (was: linux-next: kvm tree build failure)
- From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: Remove old kvm_guest_debug structs
- From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
- From: David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: kvm tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081217-s390x-'struct device' has no member named 'knode_parent'
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
- From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (DVB)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: rr series import failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081217-s390x-'struct device' has no member named 'knode_parent'
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node V2
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- next-20081217: general protection fault: tty
- From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: cpu_alloc tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node V2
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16)
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
- From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount'
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount'
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount'
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: net tree build warnings
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
- From: "Alexey Zaytsev" <alexey.zaytsev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] sgi-xp: xpc needs to pass the physical address, not virtual
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build warnings
- From: James Smart <James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
- From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: cpu_alloc tree
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
- From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] simnet: convert to net_device_ops
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: cpu_alloc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: semaphore-removal tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node V2
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] mtd: fix nandsim sched.h references
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] mtd: fix nettel printk formats
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] mtd: fix m25p80 printk formats
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] mtd: fix dataflash printk formats
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (MTD)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 12 (netdev ops)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (netlabel)
- From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (netlabel)
- From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
- From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
- From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for December 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: spaseirq tree build warning
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: scsi tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: tree build warning
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: tree build warning
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]