On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:00:54PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > Yes, it's obviously bogus. Dropped from the tree; I don't think it's > really salvagable - even merging into one unsigned long will not be > enough, since we will end up with different locking for different bits. Oops, sorry, I didn't realize we were using bitops for i_state. As far as I can tell we're not using the bitops functions for i_flags, though. Is that right? So we can convert i_flags to be a unsigned short, but we can't do anything with i_state. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html