On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:00:54PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Yes, it's obviously bogus. Dropped from the tree; I don't think it's
> really salvagable - even merging into one unsigned long will not be
> enough, since we will end up with different locking for different bits.
Oops, sorry, I didn't realize we were using bitops for i_state. As
far as I can tell we're not using the bitops functions for i_flags,
though. Is that right? So we can convert i_flags to be a unsigned
short, but we can't do anything with i_state.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
