* Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This code has been NAK-ed by the x86 maintainers: > > > > - Due to the absurd irrelevance of Voyager/x86/Linux hardware > > > > - Due to the thousands of lines of of code it adds to arch/x86 > > to support a 486/P5 era piece of hardware > > > > - and due to its negative track record of: > > > > v2.6.27.0: Voyager was broken - it did not even build. (!) > > v2.6.28.0: Voyager was broken - it did not even build. (!) > > v2.6.29-rc5: Voyager was broken - it did not even build. (!) > > So Ingo you are arguing "It didn't work in some releases so we > want to make it continue not to work by trying to keep the fixes > out" ? No. This code is not in Linux right now, and that i see no reason to put it back, for the (many) reasons outlined. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
