Re: linux-next: md tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, June 1, 2009 3:13 pm, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> > Caused by commit e1defc4ff0cf57aca6c5e3ff99fa503f5943c1f1 ("block:
>>> > Do away with the notion of hardsect_size") from the block tree
>>> > interacting with commit 131e4477401ae76a9cbe8539e4b7819e04cfba36
>>> > ("md: raid0: chunk size check in raid0_run") from the md tree.
>
> Stephen> So, is anything happening about these?  I still get these (and
> Stephen> the dm) build failures.
>
> There's a replacement DM patch kit brewing that will hopefully come your
> way shortly.  It replaces the patches currently in Alasdair's tree.
> Mike sent the kit out for review last week and I'm currently testing it.
>
>
> I don't know what Neil's plans are.  Neil: Do you want to rebase your
> tree, fix up the conflicting patches or how would you like to handle
> this?

I'm happy to rebase on something if you have a tree that doesn't have too
much more than the changes that are causing conflicts.
Then I'll fix my patches so they work on that tree.

What should I pull??

NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux