On Wednesday June 3, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> James often rebases against Jens' tree because there's frequently
> dependencies between between block and SCSI during the merge. I suggest
> you do the same.
OK, I've just rebased my for-next tree against Jens' for-next, and
fixed the compile error with this incremental patch
--- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int create_strip_zones(mddev_t *mddev)
* now since we have the hard sector sizes, we can make sure
* chunk size is a multiple of that sector size
*/
- if (mddev->chunk_size % mddev->queue->hardsect_size) {
+ if (mddev->chunk_size % queue_logical_block_size(mddev->queue)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s chunk_size of %d not valid\n",
mdname(mddev),
mddev->chunk_size);
I assume that is the preferred usage?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
