On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Alan is definitely right that we're likely to see more of the "non-PC" > > platforms as x86 tries to do embedded. > > I agree, but the way voyager is done is _not_ a good example for the > embedded x86 folks who will probably start to send in their scoop in > the foreseable future. > > I'm not fundamentally against bringing Voyager back, but it needs to > go through a useful patch submission and review process and not by > forcing voyager wreckage into our code base. Ok, thanks. This was exactly the kind of thing I wanted to hear. It does sound like the Voyager tree is doing things I myself wouldn't approve of as a maintainer, so I can't really say that I'm upset by the x86 maintainers then not pulling it. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
