Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:44:51AM CEST, sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>This fixes it (I wonder if this bug is lurking in any other drivers):
Grepping the sources I see some other places suffering this problem. I'll send
patch for this.
>
>From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:24:02 +1000
>Subject: [PATCH] net/ibmveth: fix panic in probe
>
>netdev->dev_addr changed from being an array to being a pointer, so we
>should not take its address for memcpy().
Nice!
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> drivers/net/ibmveth.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
>index 7902e5e..8daffad 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ibmveth.c
>@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ static int __devinit ibmveth_probe(struct vio_dev *dev, const struct vio_device_
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX;
> spin_lock_init(&adapter->stats_lock);
>
>- memcpy(&netdev->dev_addr, &adapter->mac_addr, netdev->addr_len);
>+ memcpy(netdev->dev_addr, &adapter->mac_addr, netdev->addr_len);
>
> for(i = 0; i<IbmVethNumBufferPools; i++) {
> struct kobject *kobj = &adapter->rx_buff_pool[i].kobj;
>--
>1.6.3
>
>
>--
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
