Hi Christoph, On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:31:39 -0400 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:00:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > The machines are PowerPC64 (so big endian). It looks to me like we use > > bitops on i_state - don't our bitops only apply to unsigned longs? > > Yes, bitops need unsigned long. And on most plaforms should give you > warnings when using them on the wrong type. In this case the "word" is being passed through wait_on_bit which takes a "void *", so we lose the type information. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpz4IuyqOG5O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
