Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 15:06:23 +0200 Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> posted to a relevant mailing list
>>>
>>>
>> was
>>
>>> reviewed
>>>
>>>
>> It was reviewed v1 - v2 contains all reported problems
>>
>>> unit tested
>>>
>>>
>> I tested it
>>
>>> destined for the next merge window (or the current release)
>>>
>>>
>> it is for next merge open window.
>>
>
> All good.
>
>
>> I see the first problem that I should use {GIT PULL] prefix in subject.
>>
>
> Not for me. Now that you have asked for inclusion, I will fetch the
> tree/branch that you pointed me to every day until you tell me not to any
> more. So all you have to do is update that branch when your new stuff
> meets the above criteria.
>
ok
> I usually don't expect any problems from the architecture trees since, as
> you say, they are usually pretty much contained to their own arch/
> directory.
>
:-) I too.
> One thing - is it easy for me to build a cross compiler for microblaze
> (i.e. does some GNU release of gcc just work)? If so, I could add some
> microblaze configs to my automated builds.
>
We have two approaches - script/crosstools. I will talk with John and
let you know.
We have to provide new tools for others too.
Anyway thanks for your offer I let you know about.
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
