Linux Sparse
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] make process_decl() aware of the presence of an initializer
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/13] llvm: fix output_op_store() which modify its operand
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [WIP 00/13] LLVM fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/13] llvm: fix type of literal integer passed as arguments
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/13] add get_nth1_arg()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/13] llvm: add a helper to convert an integer to a ValueRef
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/13] llvm: fix: do not mix pointers and floats when doing compares
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/13] give a type to OP_SEL, always
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/13] llvm: fix translation of PSEUDO_VALs into a ValueRefs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/13] llvm: fix output OP_ADD mixed with pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/13] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/13] llvm: remove unneeded arg 'module'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/13] llvm: remove unneeded arg 'fn'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/13] give a type to OP_PHISOURCE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/13] llvm: add support for OP_NEG
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse-llvm the result of expression add assign when target is a pointer should be a pointer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- sparse-llvm the result of expression add assign when target is a pointer should be a pointer
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: fix: do not mix pointers and floats when doing compares
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: add support for OP_NEG
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] give a type to OP_PHISOURCE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] give a type to OP_SEL, always
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse-llvm incorrect handling of comparison ops when pointers are involved
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse-llvm incorrect handling of op_add when pointers are involved
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- sparse-llvm handling of function call arguments
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: fix output_op_[ptr]cast()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: stores does not create or modify their target
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Possible memory leak in sparse-llvm
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: fix getting type of values
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] more validation of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] more validation of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] split OP_BR between OP_BR & OP_CBR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] split OP_BR between unconditional & conditional: OP_CBR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] remove unused helper is_branch_goto()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/7] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 5/7] check the storage of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 7/7] move check extern with initializer to default_process_decl()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 6/7] make process_decl() aware of the presence of an initializer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/7] add test cases for storage of c99 for-loop declarations
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/7] add test case for scope of C99 for-loop declarations
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/7] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/7] more validation of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sparse-LLVM issue compiling NULL pointers
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] split OP_BR between unconditional & conditional: OP_CBR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] ignore whole-range overlapping initializer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] use VOID instead of directly using &void_pseudo
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] ignore whole-range overlapping initializer
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] use VOID instead of directly using &void_pseudo
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] split OP_BR between unconditional & conditional: OP_CBR
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] fix size of loaded bitfields
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] CSE: relax type checking in hashing/compare
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix size of loaded bitfields
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] CSE: relax type checking in hashing/compare
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix size of loaded bitfields
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix size of loaded bitfields
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] CSE: relax type checking in hashing/compare
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] CSE: improve hashing of non-commutative binops
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] pull: make smatch scan output easy to digest
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] pull: make smatch scan output easy to digest
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] pull: make smatch scan output easy to digest
- From: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@xxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Unreachable code diagnostic
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] assorted cleanups
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix usage in simplify_seteq_setne()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] CSE: improve hashing of non-commutative binops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] CSE: improve hashing of non-commutative binops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] CSE: improve hashing of non-commutative binops
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix expansion cost of pure functions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix expansion cost of pure functions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix expansion cost of pure functions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix expansion cost of pure functions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] Allow casting to a restricted type if !restricted_value
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] allow to warn on all overlapping initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] fix checking of overlapping initializer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] use option: '-Woverride-init'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] add test case for warnings about overlapping initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] improve detection of overlapping initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] ignore whole-range overlapping initializer
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: traps: Mark __le16, __le32, __user variables properly
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] Allow casting to a restricted type if !restricted_value
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: traps: Mark __le16, __le32, __user variables properly
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: traps: Mark __le16, __le32, __user variables properly
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Allow casting to a restricted type if !restricted_value
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] use VOID instead of directly using &void_pseudo
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] add test case for scope of C99 for-loop declarations
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] add test cases for storage of c99 for-loop declarations
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/5] more validation of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] check the storage of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] make -Wbitwise operational again
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] check the storage of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] add a method to external_declaration()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] add test cases for storage of c99 for-loop declarations
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] add test case for scope of C99 for-loop declarations
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] replace test for c99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] more validation of C99 for-loop initializers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] split OP_BR between unconditional & conditional: OP_CBR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] remove unused helper is_branch_goto()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] split OP_BR between OP_BR & OP_CBR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Allow casting to a restricted type if !restricted_value
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Allow casting to a restricted type if !restricted_value
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] Add test case for casts to restricted types
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/2] Allow casting to a restricted type if !restricted_value
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/2] allow casting unrestricted values
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix size of loaded bitfields
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add missing braces around FOR_EACH_PTR loop
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC,original PATCH] CSE: let equivalent cast hash & compare identically
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] CSE: relax type checking in hashing/compare
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] CSE: improve hashing of non-commutative binops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] CSE: add test cases for comparisons duality
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] CSE: avoid hashing removed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] CSE: use commutativity to identify equivalent instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] CSE improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix expansion cost of pure functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] simplify float-to-float casts that doesn't change size
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] simplify float-to-float casts that doesn't change size
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/16] fix OP_PHI usage in try_to_simplify_bb()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/16] use kill_instruction() when killing any instructions during CSE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/16] use kill_instruction() when killing an OP_PHI during CSE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/16] fix killing of rewritten loads
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/16] add killing of stores
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/16] add killing of non-volatile loads
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/16] fix killing OP_CALL via pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/16] add killing of pure calls
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/16] kill_instruction() may need to be forced or not
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/16] fix killing of otherwise not-handled instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/16] remove unused clear_phi()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/16] fix clear_phi(), replace it by kill_instruction()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/16] fix killing of OP_PHIs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/16] add helper kill_use_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/16] add killing of OP_PHISOURCEs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/16] add killing of OP_SLICEs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/16] instructions killing & operands usage
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] simplify float-to-float casts that doesn't change size
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] assorted cleanups
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] assorted cleanups
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] assorted cleanups
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] fix show-parse()'s labels
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] remove unused field 'goto_bb' in struct statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] remove unused field 'multijmp' in struct statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] cleanup: there is no 'struct phi' to allocate
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Casting 0 to a __bitwise type
- From: Edward Cree <ecree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] builtins expansion
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] testsuite improvements
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Chris Li <christ.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 14/14] testsuite: quieter error reporting for 'known-to-fail'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/14] testsuite: allow quieter error reporting
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/14] testsuite: get 'check-known-to-fail' earlier
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/14] testsuite: use 'error' instead of 'info' for successful tests known to fail
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/14] testsuite: check the nbr of times a pattern should be present
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/14] testsuite: add some selfchecking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/14] testsuite: check patterns presence or absence in output
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/14] allow to launch the test suite from the project root dir
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/14] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/14] testsuite: add tag to ignore the output/error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/14] testsuite: add a simple test for -Wenum-mismatch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/14] testsuite: simplify the ioc-typecheck case
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/14] testsuite: make tests known to fail effectively fail
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/14] testsuite: give a proper name to the 'binary-constant' test
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/14] testsuite improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] expand __builtin_bswap*() with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] let identical symbols share their evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] move evaluation & expansion of builtins in a separate file
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] builtins expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] compiler/compiler-gcc: Add __fallthrough
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler/compiler-gcc: Add __fallthrough
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler/compiler-gcc: Add __fallthrough
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse: add nocapture as an ignored attribute
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH 4/4] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH 4/4] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix killing OP_SETVAL instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/5] simplify '(x * -1)' to '-x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 5/5] simplify '(x % 1)' into '0'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/5] move OP_MUL simplification in a separate function
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Chris Li <christ.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] diagnose unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC,PATCH 4/4] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] define __LONG_MAX__ & __SIZEOF_POINTER__
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] add an helper for common predefined macros
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] define __LP64__ & _LP64 if arch_m64 is enabled
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] improve -m32/-m64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Chris Li <christ.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] simplify '(x * -1)' to '-x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] move OP_MUL simplification in a separate function
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] simplify '(x % 1)' into '0'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] diagnose unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] diagnose unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] add testcase for wrong early escape conversion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] warn on unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] remove 'Escape' from token character class
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] make -m32/-m64 more useful
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] remove unused field 'multijump' in struct instruction
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] add helper: is_scalar_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] validate expression's type in conditionals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] validate expression's type in conditionals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] fix conditional context test case with void
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- status of sparse-next
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 8/8] cleanup kill_instruction()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 7/8] explicitely ignore killing OP_ENTRY
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/8] fix killing OP_COMPUTEDGOTO
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/8] fix killing OP_CAST & friends
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/8] fix killing OP_PHI instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/8] fix killing OP_SELECT
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/8] kill uses of replaced instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/8] fix crash while testing between conditional & unconditional OP_BR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix crash while testing between conditional & unconditional OP_BR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-llvm question
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sparse-llvm question
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding sizeof long
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding sizeof long
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Query regarding sizeof long
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] expand __builtin_bswap*() with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] move evaluation & expansion of builtins in a separate file
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] builtins expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix cast's target type info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: check the nbr of times a pattern should be present
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] more testsuite improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: use 'error' instead of 'info' for successful tests known to fail
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: get 'check-known-to-fail' earlier
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: quieter error reporting for 'known-to-fail'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: allow quieter error reporting
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] C11: teach sparse about '--std={c11,gnu11}'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Alignof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Alignas()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Noreturn'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Thread_local'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] add basic support for C11
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix value of label statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] missing load simplification
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] fix phisrc mixup
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] volatile loads must not be simplified
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] fix superfluous phisrc
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] phisrc fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cgcc should not define non-reserved identifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgcc and -Dx86_64
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgcc and -Dx86_64
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- cgcc and -Dx86_64
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] unssa: update comment about the unneeded copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] unssa: eliminate trivial phisrc copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] unssa: simplify rewrite of OP_PHISOURCE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] unssa: try to avoid some OP_PHI copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/5] unssa improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] unssa: do not try to update liveness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] simplify '(x || x)' and '(x && x)'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] simplify comparisons followed by an equality test against 0 or 1
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] fix cast to bool
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] fix cast to bool
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: remove unneeded OP_COPY support
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: fix typing when comparing to a constant
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] fix missing element in types declaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] add support for __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Update maintainers in the manpage
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Update maintainers in the manpage
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove unused arg in uses/defs functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] recursive phi_defines cannot happen
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove unused fields in struct instruction
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] make -m32/-m64 more useful
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] simplify '(x op x)' to '0', '1' or 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] add warning option '-Wtautological-compare'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] simplify binops with identical operands
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] simplify '(x || 1)' to '1'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] simplify '~(~x)' and '-(-x)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] simplify '(x % 1)' into '0'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] simplify '(x * -1)' to '-x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] move OP_MUL simplification in a separate function
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] unssa: update comment about the unneeded copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] unssa: eliminate trivial phisrc copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] unssa: try to avoid some OP_PHI copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] unssa: simplify rewrite of OP_PHISOURCE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] unssa: do not try to update liveness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] unssa improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- OP_PHISOURCE's phi_users
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] some modifiers need to be preserved by 'typeof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] testsuite: test modifiers preserved by 'typeof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: test modifiers preserved by '&' operator
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] use a shorter name for function-pointer-modifier-inheritance.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] testsuite: simplify test function-pointer-inheritance
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] modifiers inheritance by '&' and 'typeof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove unused field 'multijump' in struct instruction
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] give comparable label's names to basic blocks
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] testsuite: add a script to normalize label names
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] testsuite: allow commands to use pipes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] let "compile" not crash on bools
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix type checking of variadic functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] fix killing OP_SETVAL instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] kill uses of replaced instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] fix killing OP_PHI instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] fix killing OP_SELECT
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] fix killing OP_COMPUTEDGOTO
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] By default disable '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: make tests known to fail effectively fail
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] fix killing OP_CAST & friends
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] mark lists to be repacked as dirty
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] add missing PACK_PTR_LIST()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] fix discarded label statement
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: add a simple test for -Wenum-mismatch
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] testsuite: add tag to ignore the output/error
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: simplify the ioc-typecheck case
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] cleanup kill_instruction()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] allow to launch the test suite from the project root dir
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] By default disable '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded variable in integer_promotion()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] explicitely ignore killing OP_ENTRY
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: give a proper name to the 'binary-constant' test
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] make 'ignored_attributes[]' static
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove unused field 'string' in struct symbol
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] linearize: Emit C99 declarations correctly
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing #include "char.h" to char.c
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix type checking of variadic functions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse releases
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse releases
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] bits_in_bool should be 8
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] bits_in_bool should be 8
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] bits_in_bool should be 8
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] fix discarded label statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] testsuite: check patterns presence or absence in output
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] fix discarded label statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] testsuite: add tag to ignore the output/error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] allow to launch the test suite from the project root dir
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] By default disable the new warning flag '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] Add a new warning flag: '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Remove unneeded variable in integer_promotion()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] By default disable '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] Add a new warning flag: '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: add a simple test for -Wenum-mismatch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: simplify the ioc-typecheck case
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: make tests known to fail effectively fail
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: give a proper name to the 'binary-constant' test
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] tests & testsuite small improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] make 'ignored_attributes[]' static
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cleanup: remove unused field 'string' in struct symbol
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add missing #include "char.h" to char.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix type checking of variadic functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: teach do_expression() to handle EXPR_OFFSETOF
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: teach do_initializer() to handle the nested EXPR_IDENTIFIER's
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] validation: Check C99 for loop variables
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] linearize: Emit C99 declarations correctly
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NiosII GCC Compiler Built-Ins Question
- From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NiosII GCC Compiler Built-Ins Question
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- NiosII GCC Compiler Built-Ins Question
- From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Review: [PATCH] Fix warning compiling sparse
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Development version of sparse?
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Development version of sparse?
- From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: make __builtin_object_size argument const
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: make __builtin_object_size argument const
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dissect: teach do_initializer() to handle the nested EXPR_IDENTIFIER's
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dissect: teach do_expression() to handle EXPR_OFFSETOF
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Question regarding anotation
- From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: take SHN_LIVEPATCH syms into account when calculating plt_max_entries
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64 live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] byteswap: don't use __builtin_bswap*() with sparse
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] byteswap: don't use __builtin_bswap*() with sparse
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm64: take SHN_LIVEPATCH syms into account when calculating plt_max_entries
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: arm64: implement live patching
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: arm64: implement live patching
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64 live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: add no_sanitize_address as an ignored attribute
- From: Rui Teng <rui.teng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] linearize: Emit C99 declarations correctly
- From: Emily Maier <emily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] validation: Check C99 for loop variables
- From: Emily Maier <emily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] compiler.h: add support for malloc attribute
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aw: Re: REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- Aw: Re: REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- Re: REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 21/21] evaluation: treat comparsions between types as integer constexpr
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 20/21] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Trinity Fuzzer Tool]
[Linux Kernel]
[Netdev]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]