Linux Sparse
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH v2 2/3] let identical symbols share their evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] move evaluation & expansion of builtins in a separate file
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] builtins expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] compiler/compiler-gcc: Add __fallthrough
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler/compiler-gcc: Add __fallthrough
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler/compiler-gcc: Add __fallthrough
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse: add nocapture as an ignored attribute
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH 4/4] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC,PATCH 4/4] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix killing OP_SETVAL instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/5] simplify '(x * -1)' to '-x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 5/5] simplify '(x % 1)' into '0'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/5] move OP_MUL simplification in a separate function
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Chris Li <christ.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] diagnose unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC,PATCH 4/4] add support for LLP64 arch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] define __LONG_MAX__ & __SIZEOF_POINTER__
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] add an helper for common predefined macros
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] define __LP64__ & _LP64 if arch_m64 is enabled
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] improve -m32/-m64
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Chris Li <christ.li@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] simplify '(x * -1)' to '-x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] move OP_MUL simplification in a separate function
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] simplify '(x % 1)' into '0'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] diagnose unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] diagnose unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] add testcase for wrong early escape conversion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] warn on unknown escapes after preprocessing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] remove 'Escape' from token character class
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] make -m32/-m64 more useful
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] arm64: Rename macro arguments to silence sparse
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] remove unused field 'multijump' in struct instruction
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] add helper: is_scalar_type()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] validate expression's type in conditionals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] validate expression's type in conditionals
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] fix conditional context test case with void
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- status of sparse-next
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 8/8] cleanup kill_instruction()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 7/8] explicitely ignore killing OP_ENTRY
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/8] fix killing OP_COMPUTEDGOTO
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/8] fix killing OP_CAST & friends
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/8] fix killing OP_PHI instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/8] fix killing OP_SELECT
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/8] kill uses of replaced instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/8] fix crash while testing between conditional & unconditional OP_BR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Output from linearize and LLVM error
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix crash while testing between conditional & unconditional OP_BR
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Sparse-llvm question
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Sparse-llvm question
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding sizeof long
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Query regarding sizeof long
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Query regarding sizeof long
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] expand __builtin_bswap*() with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] move evaluation & expansion of builtins in a separate file
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] builtins expansion
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix cast's target type info
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: check the nbr of times a pattern should be present
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] more testsuite improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: use 'error' instead of 'info' for successful tests known to fail
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: get 'check-known-to-fail' earlier
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: quieter error reporting for 'known-to-fail'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: allow quieter error reporting
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] C11: teach sparse about '--std={c11,gnu11}'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Alignof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Alignas()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Noreturn'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] C11: teach sparse about '_Thread_local'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] add basic support for C11
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix value of label statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] missing load simplification
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] fix phisrc mixup
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] volatile loads must not be simplified
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] fix superfluous phisrc
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] phisrc fixes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cgcc should not define non-reserved identifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgcc and -Dx86_64
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cgcc and -Dx86_64
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- cgcc and -Dx86_64
- From: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] unssa: update comment about the unneeded copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] unssa: eliminate trivial phisrc copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] unssa: simplify rewrite of OP_PHISOURCE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] unssa: try to avoid some OP_PHI copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/5] unssa improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] unssa: do not try to update liveness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] simplify '(x || x)' and '(x && x)'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] simplify comparisons followed by an equality test against 0 or 1
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] fix cast to bool
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] fix cast to bool
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: remove unneeded OP_COPY support
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] llvm: fix typing when comparing to a constant
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] add support for __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] fix missing element in types declaration
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] add support for __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Update maintainers in the manpage
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Update maintainers in the manpage
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove unused arg in uses/defs functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] recursive phi_defines cannot happen
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove unused fields in struct instruction
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] make -m32/-m64 more useful
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] simplify '(x op x)' to '0', '1' or 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] add warning option '-Wtautological-compare'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] simplify binops with identical operands
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] simplify '(x || 1)' to '1'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] simplify '~(~x)' and '-(-x)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] simplify '(x % 1)' into '0'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] simplify '(x / -1)' to '-x' (but only for signed division)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] simplify '(x * -1)' to '-x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] simplify '(x / 1)' to 'x'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] move OP_MUL simplification in a separate function
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] more simplification of constant multiplicative ops
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] fix typing error in compound assignment
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] unssa: update comment about the unneeded copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] unssa: eliminate trivial phisrc copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] unssa: try to avoid some OP_PHI copies
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] unssa: simplify rewrite of OP_PHISOURCE
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] unssa: do not try to update liveness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] unssa improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- OP_PHISOURCE's phi_users
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] some modifiers need to be preserved by 'typeof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] testsuite: test modifiers preserved by 'typeof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: test modifiers preserved by '&' operator
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] use a shorter name for function-pointer-modifier-inheritance.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] testsuite: simplify test function-pointer-inheritance
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] storage should not be inherited by pointers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] modifiers inheritance by '&' and 'typeof()'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add test case for builtin bswap with constant args
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] lib: __builtin_object_size should accept void *
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove unused field 'multijump' in struct instruction
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] OP_SWITCH should use 'insn->cond' instead of 'insn->target'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] give comparable label's names to basic blocks
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] normalize bb's label names for testing
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] testsuite: add a script to normalize label names
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] testsuite: allow commands to use pipes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] let "compile" not crash on bools
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix type checking of variadic functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] fix killing OP_SETVAL instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] kill uses of replaced instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] fix killing OP_PHI instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] fix killing OP_SELECT
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] fix killing OP_COMPUTEDGOTO
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] By default disable '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: make tests known to fail effectively fail
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] fix killing OP_CAST & friends
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/8] fix uses of killed instructions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] mark lists to be repacked as dirty
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] add missing PACK_PTR_LIST()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] be more generous with ptrlist repacking
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] fix discarded label statement
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: add a simple test for -Wenum-mismatch
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] testsuite: add tag to ignore the output/error
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: simplify the ioc-typecheck case
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] cleanup kill_instruction()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] allow to launch the test suite from the project root dir
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] By default disable '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove unneeded variable in integer_promotion()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] explicitely ignore killing OP_ENTRY
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: give a proper name to the 'binary-constant' test
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] make 'ignored_attributes[]' static
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove unused field 'string' in struct symbol
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] linearize: Emit C99 declarations correctly
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] add missing #include "char.h" to char.c
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix type checking of variadic functions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse releases
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse releases
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] bits_in_bool should be 8
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] bits_in_bool should be 8
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] bits_in_bool should be 8
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Handle SForced in storage_modifiers
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] fix discarded label statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] testsuite: check patterns presence or absence in output
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] fix discarded label statement
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] testsuite: add tag to ignore the output/error
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] allow to launch the test suite from the project root dir
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] By default disable the new warning flag '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] Add a new warning flag: '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Remove unneeded variable in integer_promotion()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] By default disable '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] Add a new warning flag: '-Wunknown-attribute'
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] Warn on unknown attributes instead of throwing errors
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] reduce noise from unknown attributes
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] testsuite: add a simple test for -Wenum-mismatch
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] testsuite: simplify the ioc-typecheck case
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] testsuite: make tests known to fail effectively fail
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: give a proper name to the 'binary-constant' test
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] tests & testsuite small improvements
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] make 'ignored_attributes[]' static
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cleanup: remove unused field 'string' in struct symbol
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cleanup: remove evaluate_arguments()'s unused argument
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] add missing #include "char.h" to char.c
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix type checking of variadic functions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: teach do_expression() to handle EXPR_OFFSETOF
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: teach do_initializer() to handle the nested EXPR_IDENTIFIER's
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] validation: Check C99 for loop variables
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] linearize: Emit C99 declarations correctly
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NiosII GCC Compiler Built-Ins Question
- From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: NiosII GCC Compiler Built-Ins Question
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- NiosII GCC Compiler Built-Ins Question
- From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Review: [PATCH] Fix warning compiling sparse
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Development version of sparse?
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Development version of sparse?
- From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: make __builtin_object_size argument const
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: make __builtin_object_size argument const
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dissect: teach do_initializer() to handle the nested EXPR_IDENTIFIER's
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dissect: teach do_expression() to handle EXPR_OFFSETOF
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: ignore __assume_aligned__ attribute
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: update __builtin_object_size() prototype
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question regarding anotation
- From: Van Oostenryck Luc <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Question regarding anotation
- From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arm64: take SHN_LIVEPATCH syms into account when calculating plt_max_entries
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64 live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] byteswap: don't use __builtin_bswap*() with sparse
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] byteswap: don't use __builtin_bswap*() with sparse
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] implement constant-folding in __builtin_bswap*()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm64: take SHN_LIVEPATCH syms into account when calculating plt_max_entries
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: arm64: implement live patching
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: arm64: implement live patching
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: implement live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64 live patching
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ptrlist: use after free in last_ptr_list()
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arm64: implement FTRACE_WITH_REGS
- From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: add 'alloc_align' to the ignored attributes
- From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: add no_sanitize_address as an ignored attribute
- From: Rui Teng <rui.teng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] linearize: Emit C99 declarations correctly
- From: Emily Maier <emily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] validation: Check C99 for loop variables
- From: Emily Maier <emily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] compiler.h: add support for malloc attribute
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aw: Re: REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- Aw: Re: REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- Re: REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- REGRESSION: implied: we have to make the false states match as well
- Re: [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 21/21] evaluation: treat comparsions between types as integer constexpr
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 20/21] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 16/21] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 15/21] expression: recognize references to labels as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] evaluate: recognize string literals as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 13/21] evaluate: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 12/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through pointer arithmetic
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 11/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through casts
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 10/21] expression, evaluate: recognize static objects as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 09/21] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 08/21] expression, evaluate: add support for tagging address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 07/21] expression: add support for tagging arithmetic constant expressions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/21] expression: examine constness of conditionals at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] expression: examine constness of preops at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/21] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 02/21] expression: init constexpr_flags at expression allocation
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Do not drop 'nocast' modifier when taking the address.
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [FAIL 0/5] Static lock analysis
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [FAIL 2/5] inspect: Show context information
- From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [FAIL 4/5] parse: Add acquire, release, requires and guarded_by attributes
- From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [FAIL 5/5] test-locks: Add lock tester
- From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [FAIL 3/5] linearize: Add context symbol name when showing context instructions
- From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [FAIL 1/5] parse: Add comment to struct statement
- From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [FAIL 0/5] Static lock analysis
- From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: s/mode_t/usage_t/ in report_member()
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: teach do_initializer() to handle the nested EXPR_IDENTIFIER's
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] dissect: teach do_expression() to handle EXPR_OFFSETOF
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix size calculation of unsized bool array
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Do not drop 'nocast' modifier when taking the address.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Do not drop 'nocast' modifier when taking the address.
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Do not drop 'nocast' modifier when taking the address.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Do not drop 'nocast' modifier when taking the address.
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Minor enhancements and fixes
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: error: ctype on uninitialized symbol
- From: Bob Copeland <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- error: ctype on uninitialized symbol
- From: Bob Copeland <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 21/21] evaluation: treat comparsions between types as integer constexpr
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 20/21] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 19/21] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 18/21] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 17/21] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 16/21] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 15/21] expression: recognize references to labels as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 14/21] evaluate: recognize string literals as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 13/21] evaluate: recognize members of static compound objects as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 12/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through pointer arithmetic
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 11/21] evaluate: recognize address constants created through casts
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 10/21] expression, evaluate: recognize static objects as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 09/21] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 08/21] expression, evaluate: add support for tagging address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 07/21] expression: add support for tagging arithmetic constant expressions
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/21] expression: examine constness of conditionals at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 05/21] expression: examine constness of preops at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 04/21] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 03/21] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 02/21] expression: init constexpr_flags at expression allocation
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 01/21] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 00/21] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] expression, evaluate: add support for recognizing address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/13] expression: recognize references to labels as address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] expression, evaluate: add support for recognizing address constants
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] expression: examine constness of conditionals at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] expression: examine constness of preops at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse error on __int128
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse error on __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/13] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/13] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/13] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/13] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/13] expression: recognize references to labels as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/13] expression, evaluate: add support for recognizing address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/13] expression: examine constness of conditionals at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/13] expression: examine constness of preops at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/13] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] Add Wall_off switch to disable errors and warnings
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse error on __int128
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix size calculation of unsized bool array
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sparse: add support for static assert
- From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Do not drop 'nocast' modifier when taking the address.
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kbuild-all] [kvm:queue 27/38] arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c:186:41: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different modifiers)
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix context checking detection of a reversed lock-pair within a basic block
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] Add Wall_off switch to disable errors and warnings
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse error on __int128
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 0/3] sparse: Introduce __private to privatize members of structs
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC v2 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 1/3] sparse: Add __private to privatize members of structs
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 2/3] RCU: Privatize rcu_node::lock
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC v2 0/3] sparse: Introduce __private to privatize members of structs
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 0/3] sparse: Introduce __private to privatize members of structs
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 2/3] RCU: Privatize rcu_node::lock
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 3/3] irq: Privatize irq_common_data::state_use_accessors
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 1/3] sparse: Add __private to privatize members of structs
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Minor enhancements and fixes
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix context checking detection of a reversed lock-pair within a basic block
- From: David Holmer <odinguru@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] compiler.h: add support for function attribute assume_aligned
- From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [kbuild-all] [kvm:queue 27/38] arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c:186:41: sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different modifiers)
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rhashtable sparse annotations?
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rhashtable sparse annotations?
- From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
- rhashtable sparse annotations?
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse error on __int128
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3 v3] Add default case to switches on enum variables
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3 v3] .gitignore: add cscope and Qt project files
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] .gitignore: add cscope and Qt project files
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] Handle all enum members in case statements
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] .gitignore: add cscope and Qt project files
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] Handle all enum members in case statements
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] Handle all enum members in case statements
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3 v2] Handle all enum members in case statements
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] remove validation/tmp.o in clean target
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Minor enhancements and fixes
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3 v2] .gitignore: add cscope and Qt project files
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 v4] Add Wall_off switch to disable errors and warnings
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 V3] Add Wall_off switch to disable errors and warnings
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 V3] Add Wall_off switch to disable errors and warnings
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 V3] Add Wall_off switch to disable errors and warnings
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3 V2] lib.c: add Wall_off switch
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3 V2] lib.c: add Wall_off switch
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] c2xml.c, parse.c: gcc 5+ stricter case statement parsing
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] Add NOWARN and NOERR compile conditions
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] .gitignore: add cscope and Qt project files
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] Minor enhancements and fixes
- From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ptrlist: reading deleted items in NEXT_PTR_LIST()
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH RFC 13/13] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 12/13] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 10/13] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 09/13] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 08/13] expression: recognize references to labels as address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 06/13] expression, evaluate: add support for recognizing address constants
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 05/13] expression: examine constness of conditionals at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 04/13] expression: examine constness of preops at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 02/13] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 00/13] improve constexpr handling
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] remove validation/tmp.o in clean target
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] remove validation/tmp.o in clean target
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] include/linux/compiler.h: unconditionally define __pmem sparse attribute
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] include/linux/compiler.h: unconditionally define __pmem sparse attribute
- From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] include/linux/compiler.h: unconditionally define __pmem sparse attribute
- From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Fix sparse check errors
- From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] compiler.h: Fix sparse check errors
- From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2 v2] validation/prototype: regression for skipping prototypes
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] sparse, llvm: compile: skip function prototypes to avoid SIGSEGV
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparse, llvm: compile: skip function prototypes to avoid SIGSEGV
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Fix sparse wannings and coccinelle warnings
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparse, llvm: compile: skip function prototypes to avoid SIGSEGV
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Fix sparse wannings and coccinelle warnings
- From: Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-4.1-rc7 and dev versions of gcc
- From: josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-4.1-rc7 and dev versions of gcc
- From: David Binderman <dcb314@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] validation/prototype: regression for skipping prototypes
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] validation/prototype: regression for skipping prototypes
- From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] build: drop -ON (optimization level) from llvm flags
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] validation/prototype: regression for skipping prototypes
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] sparse, llvm: compile: skip function prototypes to avoid SIGSEGV
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] sparse-llvm: avoid SIGSEGV for function prototypes
- From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why sparse does not support context tracking?
- From: Alexander Riesen <alexander.riesen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Trinity Fuzzer Tool]
[Linux Kernel]
[Netdev]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]