On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The array is statically initialized and never modified,
> your patch shouldn't change anything, and this regardless of
> the memory layout or compiler options.
The problem is the _size_ of the array. Without that initializer for
SForced case, it is one entry too small, and you get a random access
past the end of the array.
The patch is definitely correct.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
