[PATCH v2 2/5] add test case for scope of C99 for-loop declarations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Insure that variable declared inside a C99 for-loop
have their scope restricted to this loop.

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 validation/c99-for-loop-decl.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 validation/c99-for-loop-decl.c

diff --git a/validation/c99-for-loop-decl.c b/validation/c99-for-loop-decl.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c2ceaab99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/validation/c99-for-loop-decl.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+static int bad_scope(void)
+{
+	int r = 0;
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+		r = i;
+	}
+
+	return i;			/* check-should-fail */
+}
+
+/*
+ * check-name: C99 for-loop declarations
+ *
+ * check-error-start
+c99-for-loop-decl.c:9:16: error: undefined identifier 'i'
+ * check-error-end
+ */
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux