On 2 March 2017 at 13:56, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:41:59AM +0000, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote: >> But I am beginning to think that there is quite a bit of work needed >> to fix the issues, and in any case it might be better to create an >> LLVM backend from the parse tree rather than the linearized version. > > Possible, but this will certainly need some work too. > True, which is why I was hoping that I could at least get the current version working. Unfortunately even the simplest programs I through at it fail. Looks like it hasn't really been tested as there is no defined subset of C that works. Maybe if we keep fixing the issues one by one we will get to a point where it works. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
