The test was relatively convoluted and it wasn't very clear what
was the problem and waht was tested.
The real problem is simply a problem about a non-constant
expression in an array designator.
Simplify the test to clearly show that.
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
---
validation/ioc-typecheck.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/validation/ioc-typecheck.c b/validation/ioc-typecheck.c
index aa060f7b..34b37d31 100644
--- a/validation/ioc-typecheck.c
+++ b/validation/ioc-typecheck.c
@@ -1,16 +1,10 @@
extern unsigned int __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC;
-#define _IOC_TYPECHECK(t) \
- ((sizeof(t) == sizeof(t[1]) && \
- sizeof(t) < (1 << 14)) ? \
- sizeof(t) : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC)
-
-#define TEST_IOCTL (50 | (_IOC_TYPECHECK(unsigned) << 8))
-
static unsigned iocnrs[] = {
- [TEST_IOCTL & 0xff] = 1,
+ [ 1 ? 0 : __invalid_size_argument_for_IOC ] = 1,
};
/*
- * check-name: correct handling of _IOC_TYPECHECK
+ * check-name: integer constant & conditional expression
+ * check-known-to-fail
*
* check-error-start
* check-error-end
--
2.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
