Re: [PATCH 2/3] allow builtins to have prototype and evaluate/expand methods

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:49:54AM +0800, Chris Li wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So far, builtin functions which had some evaluate/expand method
> > couldn't also have a prototype because each would have its own symbol
> > and only the one for the prototype will be seen.
> > This also meant that the evaluate/expand functions had to take care
> > to set the correct types for they argumenst & results, which is fine
> > for some generic builtins like __builtin_constant_p() it's much less
> > practical for the ones like __builtin_bswap{16,32,64}().
> >
> > Fix this by marking the idents for the builtins we declare some
> > evaluate/expand methods has being the ident of a builtin function
> > and later at evaluation time, to share the methods between all the symbols
> > corresponding to an identifier so marked.
> 
> This certainly fix the problem for builtin functions. However, I think there
> is more general bug in sparse not limit to builtin functions. When the symbol
> is declare twice, the later one did not migrate all the declare information from
> the previous one.

I'm very well aware of this bug/problem, it creates all sort of complications
but I vaguely understood it was a design choice. To be 100%, you're talking
the fact that each declaration create a new symbol only related by their
identifier chain, right?

> In function external_declaration()
> 
>         check_declaration(decl);
>         if (decl->same_symbol)
>                 decl->definition = decl->same_symbol->definition;
> 
> Here it only migrates the definition. I think if you add symbol->op in
> the migration
> as well, it *should* work for your case. I haven't test this myself.
> If that works for you, it is a more general fix. Want to give it a try?
> 
> We might want to extract the migration code into a new function and
> later adding new code it. e.g. function attributes.

Yes and diagnose any compatibility.
I'll give it a try but I won't be able to do that before the weekend.

Luc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux