On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 10:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > gcc clearly allows that, and this makes no difference since we > can still pass a non-const pointer without warnings. > > Add a test for it, while at it. Oh, now I see Lance already sent this patch, sorry. I have a test, if you like that better, but whatever. Would be nice if you could apply either one though :) Thanks, johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
