Re: [PATCH 0/7] pull: make smatch scan output easy to digest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 05:32:23PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> text-utils/more.c:674:43: error: symbol 'end_it' redeclared with different 
> type (originally declared at text-utils/more.c:143) - different modifiers
> 
> that are caused by lack of function attributes in declaration, while 
> fuction has them.

Yes, this is a sparse's bug.
I hope I'll be able to look at it soon.

> See below simple source file that demonstrates how to triggers warning in 
> question. When I said was 'smatch' printed warnings it was cgcc that was 
> complaining , and therefore this is not really a 'smatch' problem at all. 
> Sorry about giving wrong impression.
> 
> When comparing gcc with clang gives very similar warning. Perhaps the 
> right way to go about this is to reorder attributes to be in front of 
> functions after all.


Luc Van Oostenryck
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux