Re: [PATCH] fix expansion cost of pure functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Christopher Li <sparse@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think dropping to zero has some thing to do with get rid of
> the side effect cost. So it possible the cost can be dropping.

No, I think the zero is just a bug, introduced in commit 8376ab091a
("sparse: Fix __builtin_safe_p for pure and const functions").

I might be missing something, but I think Luc's patch is fine.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux