On 2 March 2017 at 17:57, Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Removing the last line of output_op_store() (insn->target->priv = target;) >> should fix this. > > In fact LLVMBuildStore() return a LLVMValueRef. > Could this be the 'void' we seen? > It returns a Value that is a store instruction, or at least that's the way I interpret this and so yes, I think the type of this was void. BTW removing the line makes progress, but it fails at the add instruction later. Are there other issues like this you can spot? I am a bit lost here I am afraid. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html