Re: [PATCH 3/5] testsuite: report as error tests known to fail but which succeed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:13:58AM +0800, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Luc Van Oostenryck
> <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Such situation may simply show that what was tested is now fixed
> > and that it's juste the test annotation which need to be adapted,
> > but can be a sign that something else is broken.
> >
> > Reporting the exact result (failure/success, known-to-fail/expect-to-succeed)
> > make the testsuite more useful and allow to use more efficiently
> > git-bisect or other automated testing tools.
> 
> I like what you are doing as a result.
> 
> But I think the implementation has room to improve.
> I don't like deep and messy "else" statement.
> 
> I attach a patch which I modify base on yours. I hope it is
> easier to read. Care to review it?
> 
> Chris

Like I said I prefer your version, but could you add the following patch
on top of yours?

---
From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 01:28:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: let the testsuite fail if we got any unexpected
 result

With this patch a failed test but known to fail will still be reported
as failed but won't make the whole testsuite to fail.
But a test known to fail but which succeed will make the testsuite
to fail. Normal tests, the ones not marked as known-to-fail, will
of course the testsuite to fail if one of them fail.

To put things simply: the testsuite will return a failure
if at least one test gave an unexpected result.

Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 validation/test-suite | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/validation/test-suite b/validation/test-suite
index 4eff0150..ee6a90a5 100755
--- a/validation/test-suite
+++ b/validation/test-suite
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ if [ ! -x "$default_path/sparse-llvm" ]; then
 	disabled_cmds="sparsec sparsei sparse-llvm"
 fi
 
+# flags:
+#	- some tests gave an unexpected result
+failed=0
+
 # counts:
 #	- tests that have not been converted to test-suite format
 #	- tests that are disabled
@@ -165,6 +169,8 @@ do_test()
 	must_fail=`expr "$?" = 0`
 	known_ko_tests=`expr $known_ko_tests + $must_fail`
 
+	[ "$test_failed" -eq "$must_fail" ] || failed=1
+
 	if [ "$must_fail" -eq "1" ]; then
 		if [ "$test_failed" -eq "1" ]; then
 			echo "info: test '$file' is known to fail"
@@ -278,5 +284,5 @@ case "$1" in
 		;;
 esac
 
-exit 0
+exit $failed
 
-- 
2.10.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [LKML]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Trinity Fuzzer Tool]

  Powered by Linux